Wednesday, February 27, 2019

http://corpau.blogspot.com/2019/02/how-do-you-know-you-live-in-police-state.html

Many people have not come up to us to ask us about the meaning of the words 'police state' where those that have did so while on an ad break from 'da footy' to return to carry on as 'normal' yelling at an inanimate object with moving pictures in it.

 

So, in order to explain the police state as simply as possible to the layman, as the freeman was dispensed off a long time ago, let's equate it to the state of an 'old school' light globe or even pregnancy. It's either on or off, a woman is either pregnant or she is not. There is no 'little bit' pregnant for example.

 

The bright spark layman may ask when did the switch turn on in Australia?

 

Once upon a time the 'free' man was a common sight on this land.

 

But that all changed on that faithful day in January of 1788, when this land became a police state.

 

Well 'technically' what came to this land was martial law (and NOT the law of G.B & I, yet), but you get the drift, right?

 

In 2014, China summed it up in a very few words too, stating that Australia is a nation once "roamed by rascals and outlaws".

 

Obviously referring to 'rascals' as those who were imprisoned for stealing bread as a result of not being able to feed their family as a result of austerity created by the people in government in England, only later to be shipped off to the new land.

With reference to the term 'outlaws' well that's easy, it's referring to the people in government in Australia.

 

The people in power on this land could not give a stuff about the (Imperial government's) law, where it got to a point that the motherland had enough and installed the Colonial Laws Validity Act in 1865, but since they don't teach you this in legal history then it's a 'conspiracy theory' right?

 

So how's it all going today?

 

EXACTLY as the law makers intend it to be.

 

When the police don't know the camera is rolling, this is an example of their 'normal' behaviour against what they are taught to be the enemy, in this case a disabled pensioner by the name of John.

 

 

It's always a good idea to have another colleague to take pictures while laughing, so that they can be shared to others in the 'force'.

 

BEFORE the days of the serfs having easily accessible surveillance technology, EIGHT police officers could bash a woman (Corinna Horvath) to an inch of her not remembering her name and get away with it for quite some time.

 

 

But when the camera's are on, it's a beautifully orchestrated false reality.

 

 

 

Or when the enemy member of the 'public' (which incidentally is a false term) helps dislodge a falling eyebrow from a police officer (as opposed to police man/woman, they got rid of them a while ago as well), it's labelled as sickening.

 

 

 

If you (the serf) try to accuse police or seek a remedy, you could die of old age in the process, where police can (and do) break into your home without a ("f#cking") warrant.

 

 

 

where you may even have to take your case out of Australia,

 

as a police officer is found not guilty of assault.

 

How to remind yourself you live in a police state:

 

If police assault you (the serf) to within a minute of your life it is only ever 'alleged', and it may very well take 20 years to see 'justice' (another false misconception). 

 

If you (the driver) get caught by a red light or speed camera, your matter is criminal, where the registered driver is not 'alleged', but by default first and foremost guilty of the offence (contrary to the law), where that person must prove otherwise and the courts deal with the matter swiftly in order for you to pay cash to the system as soon as possible.

Posted by AuCorp at 9:32 AM 

Labels: ABC - Australia Backwards CountryAMI - Anglo Masonic InfluenceLaws for CriminalsMoney for MatesNanny StatePCP - Penal Colony PoliciesPolitics

EXCLUSIVE BY MARK WILLACY AND ALEXANDRA BLUCHER FOR ABC INVESTIGATIONS UPDATED ABOUT 3 HOURS AGO

Email Facebook Twitter WhatsApp

PHOTO 

The QPS did not respond to questions about why Ms Stewart's infringement notice had been withdrawn.

SUPPLIED: @COPSTEWART

The wife of Queensland's Police Commissioner has had an infringement notice for running a stop sign torn up after appealing to the officer in charge of the local station.

Key points:

  • The ABC understands Ms Stewart challenged the traffic ticket on the grounds it was incorrectly issued
  • Police Minister Mark Ryan said he was unaware of the matter
  • The QPS said anyone who had been given an infringement notice had the legal right to ask for it to be withdrawn [ but it won't do the "average Joe Blow" any good.]

The ABC understands the senior constable who issued the ticket to Carol Stewart has since gone on leave.  Leave on full-pay, no doubt

Ms Stewart was booked recently after failing to stop at a stop sign in the Sandgate police district.

The Queensland Police Service (QPS) confirmed to the ABC that she had been issued an infringement but had "exercised her legal right and wrote a letter to the Officer in Charge, in the area where the alleged offence occurred, seeking for the ticket to be withdrawn". [ "Dear Senior Constable, my husband Ian, tells me there is an immediate vacancy at Thargomindah.]

Do you know more about this story? Email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The QPS said this was a process open to "all members of the public who have been issued an infringement notice".

"Ms Stewart received a response in writing from the Officer in Charge outlining the Infringement Notice had been withdrawn." [ as air-conditioning out west gives him hay-fever ]

The QPS did not respond to questions about why it had been withdrawn.

But the ABC understands that Ms Stewart, who is a former police officer, challenged the ticket on the grounds that it was incorrectly issued. [ you or I, 'Plod' would just re-issue the ticket ]

A "fail to stop at stop sign" infringement carries a $391 fine and three demerit points.

PHOTO Mr Stewart was appointed in 2012 and is retiring in July.

AAP IMAGE: DAVE HUNT

In a statement to the ABC, Police Minister Mark Ryan said he "had no prior knowledge of this matter".

"As I have always said, if anyone has any concerns about any matter, I encourage them to report those concerns to the appropriate body," he said. [ and 'Plod' will follow it up, oops I mean 'Plod' will follow you around.]

This week Commissioner Ian Stewart announced he would retire from his $614,000 position in July.

Mr Stewart was appointed to the top job in 2012 and had been extended in the role until the end of 2020.

"It was always my intention to leave sometime in that period," he said at a press conference this week.

"This is just the right time for me and my family."

http://www.mygc.com.au/police-officer-charged-with-distributing-child-abuse-material/

Police officer charged with ‘distributing child abuse material’

January 24, 2019 3:30 pm in New South Wales by Jaydan Duck

A NEW South Wales police officer has been suspended with pay after being charged with possessing and distributing child abuse images.

The 55-year-old male Sergeant was issued a future court attendance notice yesterday for the offences of disseminating and possessing child abuse material.

The two charges related to offences which allegedly occurred on Monday, December 17 last year.

The officer, identified only as being attached to the Western Region, has been ordered to appear in Narrabri Local Court on Tuesday, March 26.

In a statement this afternoon, NSW Police confirmed the officer has been suspended with pay.  You beauty, a fully funded rest break to prepare for court

If you have information for Police, please contact NSW Police on 131 444 or provide information using their online form 24 hours per day. 

You can report also information about crime anonymously to Crime Stoppers by calling 1800 333 000 or via nsw.crimestoppers.com.au 24 hours per day. Crime Stoppers is a registered charity and community volunteer organisation.

http://corpau.blogspot.com/2019/01/paedophile-cop-grooms-teen-in-foster.html

 

Wednesday, January 23, 2019









Key points:
  • Gopinath met the girl when she asked him for a ride home from the police station
  • He sent 146 messages to the girl over the course of a month
  • After the girl told another officer about Gopinath's behaviour, he claimed she was trying to blackmail him

Vikram Gopinath, 29, from Mildura, pleaded guilty to attempting to procure a child of 16 or 17 for sex and one charge of misconduct in public office.

The County Court heard that Gopinath had known the girl from when she was 13 years old and was aware of the girl's "vulnerability and susceptibilities".

The court heard she had a history of offending, had a difficult family situation and was a ward of the state.

"This was an aggravating feature," Judge Frank Gucciardo told him in sentencing.

The court heard the girl — known as N by the court — was at the Mildura Police Station in December 2016 and had asked Senior Constable Gopinath for a ride home.

When she got home, the court heard she sent him a note of thanks via Facebook Messenger.

The pair exchanged messages initially about the girl's troubles at home.

That escalated from "normal conversation to sexualised messages" the court heard.

The court heard on one occasion Gopinath arranged to pick her up around the corner from her foster home so as "not to alert" her carers.

On another, he told her to jump out the window to meet him.

He had asked her to send nude pictures of herself, and had sent a photo of himself in uniform taken from a low angle, saying "That is the view ur gunna have on ur knees baby ;)"

Girl reported messages after an argument

The court heard after Gopinath and N had an argument in January 2017, she sent him a text message.

"You lie about everything, I'm showing your work these photos," the message said.

The court heard the girl alerted another officer to the photos and when Gopinath was asked about them, he told the officer he had lost his phone.

The girl then contacted an off-duty officer claiming to have found the phone in a local mall.

The court heard Gopinath tried to turn the allegations back on the girl, and claimed she was trying to blackmail him.

"She tried to kiss me at one point, but I pushed her away," the court was told Gopinath had told other officers.

"I made it very clear I wanted to be friends, to help her with what she was going through."

Over a month-long period, the court heard Gopinath had sent 146 separate messages and had received more than 440 messages from the teenager.

The girl recorded 87 phone calls, some of which detailed the sexual activity.
"You lost sight of your position and age," Judge Gucciardo said.
"It is utterly reprehensible," Judge Gucciardo said of Gopinath's misconduct.

"When compounded by lies and untruths it is incomprehensible."

While Judge Frank Gucciardo acknowledged Gopinath had only kissed the girl, he said Gopinath had shown no insight into the impact the crime had on the teenage victim.

On the second charge of misconduct in public office, Gopinath was given a two-year corrections order.

Source: abc.net.au