https://www.9news.com.au/national/nsw-police-officer-pleads-guilty-wearing-war-medals-not-entitled-to-on-highway-patrol-tv-show/201b466f-7893-4ec2-989f-8c055061de12?fbclid=IwAR2fTKNAKBiEnVRQeYIeb4W7Rrn1ILMP_whzKRLL4ue-4Tw1Roxs-kfeArU

 
 
A 45-year-old NSW Police Senior Constable has pleaded guilty to wearing war service medals he wasn't entitled to while in uniform on a TV reality show.
Complaints were made by eagle-eyed viewers about Darrin Hooper, an officer attached to the Highway and Traffic command, after he was seen on a 2018 episode of Highway Patrol.
He was wearing the Australian Service Ribbon, Timor-Leste Solidarity Ribbon and the Infantry Combat Badge. It's a combination of medals which is not possible.
Complaints were made by eagle-eyed viewers about Darrin Hooper, an officer attached to the Highway and Traffic command, after he was seen on a 2018 episode of Highway Patrol.
Complaints were made by eagle-eyed viewers about Darrin Hooper, an officer attached to the Highway and Traffic command, after he was seen on a 2018 episode of Highway Patrol. (9News)
They are also medals obtained through active service and overseas deployment.
Hooper was charged with wearing a service decoration when not entitled to, which has a maximum penalty of six months jail.
Today, after his guilty plea, Hooper refused to comment when asked if his actions were disrespectful to war veterans.
He will be sentenced next week.

The former NSW police officer, Vaughan Mark Hildebrand was sentenced last week to 20 years behind bars for blackmailing multiple women into having sex with him.

THE STORY

The Sydney Morning Herald reported last Friday that the former policeman tormented 15 victims in total, four of whom he scammed or bullied into having intercourse.

On Friday, he was jailed for his “cunning, calculating and manipulative” crimes. NSW District Court Judge Robyn Tupman delivered the scathing assessment of his behaviour as he sat before her in prison greens and was sentenced to a total of 20 years’ jail with a non-parole period of 15 years.

She said “He failed as a human being in the way he did abuse, manipulate and callously deal with the victims of all of these offences. He abused his position as a police officer, he abused the trust of his friends, he abused the trust of his partner.”

The 30-year-old had previously admitted to 44 offences and pleaded guilty to 11 counts of having sexual intercourse without consent, 10 of using a carriage service to menace or harass and one of using the same to solicit child pornography.

The court heard bizarre details of Hildebrand’s abuse, including his use of fake identities to contact women he was friends with and threats to release intimate photos of them unless they sent him more naked images.

More than once the women asked him for help, having no idea the man they believed was a friend was actually the stranger tormenting them through Facebook and Snapchat.

One ex-girlfriend turned to him after a someone using a random number contacted her and tried to blackmail her into sending pictures of her breasts. She sent Hildebrand screenshots of the messages and he offered to help but in return, asked for oral sex because solving the problem would involve him approaching people who would be breaking the law.

When he then threatened to send photos from their former relationship to her parents, the woman relented.

A number of Hildebrand’s victims were fellow police officers, one he’d become close to when they were on patrol together on the morning of the 2014 Lindt Cafe siege.

The court previously heard Hildebrand’s first offence occurred in 2007, when his victim was a teenager. He forced her to perform oral sex by threatening to send nude images of her to her family and friends, and later to her boss.

His abuse of the young woman escalated over time to the point that he played with knives in her company while describing how he hunted and killed pigs.

At one stage after he became a policeman, she came to him for advice about a relative’s arrest and he forced her into sex again by either saying he would either help through his contacts or get “him put away”.

He will be eligible for release in May 2032.

SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITHOUT CONSENT – THE LAW

The offence of sexual assault can be found in section 61l of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). This section states:

Any person who has sexual intercourse with another person without the consent of the other person and who knows that the other person does not consent to the sexual intercourse is liable to  imprisonment for 14 years.

There are 3 important elements of this offence:

  • There must be sexual intercourse;
  • Without the consent of the other person; and
  • You must know that the other person does not give consent.

To read more about sex offences, click on this link.

USING A CARRIAGE SERVICE TO MENACE OR HARASS – DEFINED

Use carriage service to menace occurs when a person uses guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy to menace, harass or cause offence. In layman terms, this refers to emails, text messages and calls and social media communications. This list however is not exhaustive and as this offence such is given quite a broad definition which covers most electronic communications.

THE LAW

The offence of “using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offence,” is a Commonwealth offence and is contained in section 474.17 the Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) which states: “a person is guilty of an offence if:

  • The person uses a carriage service; and
  • The person does so in a way (whether by the method of use or the content of a communication, or both) that reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, menacing, harassing or offensive.”

Use Carriage Service to Menace can be punished with a prison sentence of up to 2 years (if heard in the Local Court) or up to 3 years (If heard in the District Court).

To read more about this offence, click on this link.

To read our previous bog on NSW Police officer faces Court over allegations of sexual assault, click here.

If you or anyone you know has been charged with any of these offences, contact National Criminal Lawyers for a free consultation.

The spend, obtained by the Herald under freedom of information, is likely to climb as the matters progress through the courts.

Shane Housego, Christian McDonald, Chris Sheehy and Steven Rapisarda with lawyer Nicholas Stewart (centre). Police have spent nearly $1 million defending their discrimination and freedom of information cases.

Shane Housego, Christian McDonald, Chris Sheehy and Steven Rapisarda with lawyer Nicholas Stewart (centre). Police have spent nearly $1 million defending their discrimination and freedom of information cases. CREDIT:JANIE BARRETT

All of the cases are linked to former Newtown superintendent Simon Hardman, who was mired in controversy over his actions as top cop and has since left the police force.

One of the officers involved, Christopher Sheehy, described the spend as a “shocking” waste of taxpayer money.

 

“[Why] NSW Police defend these kind of matters so ferociously is to discourage people from taking action,” Mr Sheehy, who has left the force, said.

"'The organisation is trying to protect a system of complaint handling which has long been misused ... to systematically target and bully officers."

A NSW Police spokesperson noted its insurer had covered the bill and the spend was not allocated on a per local area command basis.

“[NSW Police] complies with its obligations under the model litigant policy and will defend claims where appropriate,” the spokesperson said.

“We will also look to resolve matters and make settlement offers where appropriate.”

 

In 2015, Superintendent Hardman wrongly accused four homosexual officers in his command of drug use.

He also falsely alleged the group had “an anecdotal reputation for loose morals and reckless behaviour” and two of the officers were “notorious for their promiscuity”.

Chris Sheehy (left) receives an award from former Newtown Police commander Simon Hardman.

Chris Sheehy (left) receives an award from former Newtown Police commander Simon Hardman.

The complaint triggered a six-month undercover investigation by police's professional standards command, which found no evidence of wrongdoing by Mr Sheehy, Christian McDonald, Shane Housego and Steven Rapisarda.

The officers are suing NSW Police for discrimination and are awaiting judgment.

 

They also lodged a series of freedom of information requests for the investigation files, through which they discovered the extent of the surveillance.

However, they lost a case before the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal over access to some files withheld and were ordered to pay the force’s costs.

NSW Police have spent $937,307 defending both matters, without taking into account the costs that appear set to be recovered in the freedom of information matter.

The fifth homosexual officer, sergeant George Zisopoulos, was sacked in 2015 for suspected drug use following a hair follicle test ordered by superintendent Hardman.

Mr Zisopoulos had an unblemished record in the force spanning more than 17 years and insisted that the follicle test was flawed.

 

He was vindicated by the Industrial Relations Commission last year, which ordered his reinstatement and found his dismissal to be “harsh, unreasonable and unjust”.

Police are appealing.

George Zisopoulos was found to have been unfairly dismissed from the NSW police force.

George Zisopoulos was found to have been unfairly dismissed from the NSW police force. CREDIT:NIC WALKER

Documents obtained by the Herald show just over $500,000 has been spent so far defending police in the proceedings against Mr Zisopoulos.

The NSW Police spokesperson said its insurer had recovered some costs in defamation proceedings that were initially pursued but then abandoned by Mr Zisopoulos.

 

 

The total legal bill will hinge on the outcome of the two matters awaiting judgment.

“Any further legal expenditure will be determined by the results of these decisions and whether any party elects to appeal,” the police spokesperson said.

Member for Newtown and Greens MP Jenny Leong said the expenditure by NSW Police was "indefensible".

“The homophobic targeting of people in their workplace  is clearly unacceptable,” she said.

 

Mr Sheehy said in hindsight, he didn’t think he would pursue the legal action again.

“The cost involved mentally and financially has been huge,” he said.

AAP
 
 
Project Servator has been used in the UK to help stop terrorist attacks and other crimes.
Project Servator has been used in the UK to help stop terrorist attacks and other crimes. Credit: AP

NSW Police are adopting a new crime-fighting tactic developed in the UK that has been used to help prevent terrorist attacks.

Project Servator involves high-visibility police patrols with an emphasis on more public interaction and preventing crimes before they happen.

The state will be the first jurisdiction outside the UK to adopt the tactic, which was pioneered by London police in 2014.

NSW Police said it involves deploying both high-visibility and plainclothes officers, including those trained to look for signs someone is planning a crime.

Project Servator patrols will wear a patch on their sleeve and will interact with members of the public, who will be encouraged to approach and help police.

The strategy has been successful in helping UK counter terrorism units prevent attacks, but Deputy Commissioner Jeff Loy said the patrols will target all levels of crime.

"The community can expect to see unpredictable, high-visibility police deployments at various locations, initially in Sydney but potentially elsewhere as well," he said in a statement on Monday.

"Uniformed, plain clothes and specialist officers will be out in force and engaging with local businesses and people going about their daily activities."

Project Servator has already gained results around the CBD in recent months, police said.